Editor-in-chief
Maria Stella Graziani

Deputy Director
Martina Zaninotto

Associate Editors
Ferruccio Ceriotti
Davide Giavarina
Bruna Lo Sasso
Giampaolo Merlini
Martina Montagnana
Andrea Mosca
Paola Pezzati
Rossella Tomaiuolo
Matteo Vidali

International Advisory Board Khosrow Adeli Canada
Sergio Bernardini Italy
Marcello Ciaccio Italy
Eleftherios Diamandis Canada
Philippe Gillery France
Kjell Grankvist Sweden
Hans Jacobs The Netherlands
Eric Kilpatrick UK
Magdalena Krintus Poland
Giuseppe Lippi Italy
☩Howard Morris Australia
Mario Plebani Italy
Sverre Sandberg Norway
Ana-Maria Simundic Croatia
☩Jill Tate Australia
Tommaso Trenti Italy
Cas Weykamp The Netherlands
Maria Willrich USA
Paul Yip Canada

Publisher
Biomedia srl
Via L. Temolo 4, 20126 Milano

Responsible Editor
Giuseppe Agosta

Editorial Secretary
Arianna Lucini Paioni
Biomedia srl
Via L. Temolo 4, 20126 Milano
Tel. 0245498282
email: biochimica.clinica@sibioc.it

Area soci

Non possiedi o non ricordi la password!
Clicca qui

BC: Articoli scritti da Gruppo di Studio SIBioC - Medicina di Laboratorio Biomarcatori di Rischio Cardiovascolare

Stato dell’arte dell’immunodosaggio dei peptidi natriuretici di tipo B
State of the art of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) immunoassays
C. Prontera \| F. Franzini \| S. Masotti \| S. Giovannini \| G.C. Zucchelli \| A. Clerico \| Gruppo di Studio SIBioC - Medicina di Laboratorio Biomarcatori di Rischio Cardiovascolare \|
<p>Recent studies have demonstrated that the precursor of BNP (proBNP) constitutes the major part of BNP-related peptides detectable in plasma of patients with heart failure by the commercially available immunoassays considered specific for the BNP hormone. Since proBNP significantly cross-reacts with commercial immunoassays for BNP, manufacturers should test and clearly declare the cross-reaction with proBNP in their BNP methods. Owing to the differences in cross-reaction with proBNP as well as in specificity, respectively, for the NH2- or COOH-terminal part of the peptide hormone chain, BNP immunoassays show significant between-method differences. Immunoassays for NT-proBNP, which all use standard materials and antibodies provided by the same company, show lower differences (generally minore del 20%). Clinicians should take into account these differences among methods when they compare results obtained from different laboratories, which use different BNP immunoassays. Accordingly, the use of a common decisional limit for all BNP immunoassay methods, as suggested by the most recent international guidelines, may be unreliable.</p>
Biochimica Clinica ; 39(5) 312-325 Rassegne - Reviews